On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 29/05/2023 13:47, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > Right now MDSS related definitions cannot be properly grouped together > > in board DTs because the labels do not use consistent prefixes. The DSI > > PHY label is particularly weird because the DSI number is at the end > > (&dsi_phy0) while DSI itself is called &dsi0. > > > > Follow the example of more recent SoCs and give all the MDSS related > > nodes a consistent label that allows proper grouping. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > You should probably churn the yaml that goes with this.. > Do you mean update the examples in the yaml bindings or what exactly? Will take a look at those in a separate change (DT bindings don't make any definitions about labels so it's not strictly related). From a quick look it even seems like the labels are even omitted mostly in the bindings. Thanks, Stephan
