Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Clean up MDSS labels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 29/05/2023 13:47, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Right now MDSS related definitions cannot be properly grouped together
> > in board DTs because the labels do not use consistent prefixes. The DSI
> > PHY label is particularly weird because the DSI number is at the end
> > (&dsi_phy0) while DSI itself is called &dsi0.
> > 
> > Follow the example of more recent SoCs and give all the MDSS related
> > nodes a consistent label that allows proper grouping.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> You should probably churn the yaml that goes with this..
> 

Do you mean update the examples in the yaml bindings or what exactly?

Will take a look at those in a separate change (DT bindings don't make
any definitions about labels so it's not strictly related). From a quick
look it even seems like the labels are even omitted mostly in the
bindings.

Thanks,
Stephan



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux