On 5/16/23 09:36, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 08-05-23, 11:28, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> On 5/8/23 05:22, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On 13-04-23, 12:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
>> >> +static const struct lynx_cfg ls1088a_cfg = {
>> >> + .lanes = 4,
>> >> + .endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE,
>> >> + .mode_conflict = lynx_ls_mode_conflict,
>> >> + .mode_apply = lynx_ls_mode_apply,
>> >> + .mode_init = lynx_ls_mode_init,
>> >
>> > So you have cfg with mode_xxx pointing to same functions for both of the
>> > versions you support... so question is why do this and not call the
>> > functions directly?
>>
>> The intention is to make it easy to add support for T-series processors,
>> which have a different PCCR layout.
>
> And when is that going to come. I would prefer this to be added when we
> have users being added
>
*shrug*
I can call them directly if you like.
--Sean
