On 08-05-23, 11:28, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 5/8/23 05:22, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 13-04-23, 12:05, Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> +static const struct lynx_cfg ls1088a_cfg = {
> >> + .lanes = 4,
> >> + .endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE,
> >> + .mode_conflict = lynx_ls_mode_conflict,
> >> + .mode_apply = lynx_ls_mode_apply,
> >> + .mode_init = lynx_ls_mode_init,
> >
> > So you have cfg with mode_xxx pointing to same functions for both of the
> > versions you support... so question is why do this and not call the
> > functions directly?
>
> The intention is to make it easy to add support for T-series processors,
> which have a different PCCR layout.
And when is that going to come. I would prefer this to be added when we
have users being added
--
~Vinod
