Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] dt-bindings: soc: starfive: Add StarFive syscon module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/05/2023 09:24, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> On 2023/5/12 14:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/05/2023 08:43, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:35:43AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 12/05/2023 04:20, Xingyu Wu wrote:
>>>>> From: William Qiu <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>>> +  "#power-domain-cells":
>>>>> +    const: 1
>>>>
>>>> Add it to the existing examples.
>>>>
>>>> This part confuses me... why aon appeared here?  Why power-controller
>>>> disappeared? I don't think that Rob or me proposed any of this.
>>>
>>> Rob did actually suggest this, as the power-controller child node had no
>>> properties other than #power-domain-cells.
>>
>> He suggested it for aon, but not for stg or sys... aon is not a child of
>> sys, is it? Then why power-controller disappeared from sys?
>>
> 
> The power-controller is only for aon, but now just use power-domain-cells instead.
> The sys only have the clock-controller child node not power-controller.
> And stg has neither.

OK, I see. Stuffing all of them in one binding suggests that anything
can be anything, but you actually have different devices with different
features/roles.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux