* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [230505 22:47]: > Tony, > > On 22:29-20230504, Rob Herring wrote: > > As discussed and attempted several times before[1][2], the flat arm32 > > directory of 1553 platforms has grown unwieldy. Past attempts stalled > > out due to plans to move .dts files out of the kernel tree. Doing that > > is no longer planned (any time soon at least), so let's go ahead and > > group .dts files by vendors. This move aligns arm with arm64 .dts file > > structure. > [...] > > Wondering if it makes to have any sense of grouping per TI SoC arch? at > least will be clear as to what is going on? > > ti/omap2 or ti/omap ? > > > 'am3' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'am4' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'am5' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'dra' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'keystone' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/keystone ? > > 'omap' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'compulab' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'logicpd' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'elpida' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'motorola' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'twl' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/omap ? > > 'da' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/davinci ? > > 'dm' : 'ti', > ^^ group as ti/davinci ? > > For me at least, this cleanly seperates things up. No objections from me to adding TI subdirectories. Rob, any issues with this? Regards, Tony
