Hi,
On 16/04/2023 01:11, Marius Hoch wrote:
<snip>
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
index 997b5ff792be..55f3738193af 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ static const struct spi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
+static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
+ {"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
+
static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
@@ -72,6 +78,7 @@ static struct spi_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "st-lsm9ds0-spi",
.of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
+ .acpi_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match,
},
.probe = st_lsm9ds0_spi_probe,
.id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,
I just realized that these changes (the SPI ones, not the I2C ones) are
entirely superfluous, and I'm not sure why I added this in the first
place. In the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 series (which seem to be the only
devices exposing this as "ACCL0001"), the device is accessible via I2C.
Just to make sure, I re-tested the patch chain without this change.
@Jonathan: Shall I upload an entirely new patch set (v4), do this in a
separate new clean up commit, or do you want to just drop these changes
to drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c? I'm fine with any of
these options.
Cheers,
Marius