Hi Krzysztof, On Mon, May 01 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 25/04/2023 10:31, Baruch Siach wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 24 2023, Baruch Siach wrote: >>> Only arm,primecell is documented as compatible string for Primecell >>> peripherals. Current code agrees with that. >> >> Once again my patches do not show up in patchwork. But they do show in >> lore: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/9e137548c4e76e0d8deef6d49460cb37897934ca.1682333574.git.baruch@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > You used subject prefix which targets Doc subsystem, but did not Cc Doc > maintainers (get_maintainers do not print them). If you target Rob's > Patchwork, probably you need to fix subject prefix. There is no "dt" prefix. Thanks for the tip. All previous commits touching Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst use 'docs' for subject prefix, including one from Rob. I followed this example. As for patchwork, I believe you refer to this one http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/list/ Not all patches on the list use dt-bindings for subject prefix. For example http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230317053415.2254616-2-frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx/ The DT submitting-patches document (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst) mentions the dt-bindings subject prefix rule. But this patch does not touch binding documentation. Is there anything I should do differently to get this patch applied? Thanks, baruch -- ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
