Hi Rob, Krzysztof, On Mon, Apr 24 2023, Baruch Siach wrote: > Only arm,primecell is documented as compatible string for Primecell > peripherals. Current code agrees with that. Once again my patches do not show up in patchwork. But they do show in lore: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/9e137548c4e76e0d8deef6d49460cb37897934ca.1682333574.git.baruch@xxxxxxxxxx/ FYI, baruch > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: > > Split the translation update to a separate patch > --- > Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst > index b6a287955ee5..0717426856b2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst > @@ -415,6 +415,6 @@ When using the DT, this creates problems for of_platform_populate() > because it must decide whether to register each node as either a > platform_device or an amba_device. This unfortunately complicates the > device creation model a little bit, but the solution turns out not to > -be too invasive. If a node is compatible with "arm,amba-primecell", then > +be too invasive. If a node is compatible with "arm,primecell", then > of_platform_populate() will register it as an amba_device instead of a > platform_device. -- ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
