Re: [PATCH 32/43] dt-bindings: gpio: Add DT bindings ep93xx gpio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Linus!

On Wed, 2023-04-26 at 22:48 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 6:32 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:34:48PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> 
> > > Add YAML bindings for ep93xx SoC.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> (...)
> > > +  chip-label:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +    description: human readable name.
> > 
> > Why do you need this? It's not standard and I don't see other GPIO
> > controllers needing it.
> 
> Caught my eye too, Nikita can you live without this and just use
> dev_name()
> or something to name the chip in Linux?
> 
> If it is to conform to EP93xx documentation naming I guess it should
> be
> cirrus,ep93xx-gpio-chip-name = "..."; ?

Nah, i should drop it, it was a reverence to people which are sad about
gpio index reordering.

Through i like the idea of "cirrus,ep93xx-gpio-chip-name".

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux