Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/3] Add support for ESM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/25/23 01:49, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
Hi Guenter

On 24/04/23 20:27, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 4/24/23 03:50, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
Resending as no major changes, commit subject change only.


Maybe you consider changing the subject of the bindings from "misc"
to "hwmon" as not being a major change, but it made me aware that you
are trying to sneak bindings which in my opinion don't belong there
into the hwmon bindings directory. This is not a hardware monitoring
device, it doesn't have anything to do with hardware monitoring, and the
bindings do not belong into bindings/hwmon/.


I understand, it's a thin line across which I pushed ESM into hwmon; my reasoning was ESM also actively looks for signals that it aggregates, and is overall monitoring the device health. But if there was an option, in order of fitting: fault/ > misc/ > hwmon/


That is really a stretch. It doesn't monitor anything. It is a signal
routing mechanism.

With that logic every transistor would be a hardware monitoring device.

Guenter




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux