On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/04/2023 13:49, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 4/12/2023 1:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 11/04/2023 18:59, Jim Quinlan wrote: > >>> Regarding "brcm,enable-l1ss": > >>> > >>> The Broadcom STB/CM PCIe HW -- a core that is also used by RPi SOCs -- > >>> requires the driver probe() to deliberately place the HW one of three > >>> CLKREQ# modes: > >>> > >>> (a) CLKREQ# driven by the RC unconditionally > >>> (b) CLKREQ# driven by the EP for ASPM L0s, L1 > >>> (c) Bidirectional CLKREQ#, as used for L1 Substates (L1SS). > >>> > >>> The HW+driver can tell the difference between downstream devices that > >>> need (a) and (b), but does not know when to configure (c). Further, the > >>> HW may cause a CPU abort on boot if guesses wrong regarding the need for > >>> (c). So we introduce the boolean "brcm,enable-l1ss" property to indicate > >>> that (c) is desired. Setting this property only makes sense when the > >>> downstream device is L1SS-capable and the OS is configured to activate > >>> this mode (e.g. policy==superpowersave). > >>> > >>> This property is already present in the Raspian version of Linux, but the > >>> upstream driver implementaion that will follow adds more details and > >> > >> typo, implementation > >> > >>> discerns between (a) and (b). > >>> > >>> Regarding "brcm,completion-timeout-us" > >>> > >>> Our HW will cause a CPU abort if the L1SS exit time is longer than the > >>> PCIe transaction completion abort timeout. We've been asked to make this > >>> configurable, so we are introducing "brcm,completion-timeout-us". > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> What happened here? Where is the changelog? > > > > It is in the cover letter: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230411165919.23955-1-jim2101024@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > but it does not look like the cover letter was copied to you or Rob. > > As you said, I did not get it. Yes, sorry about that; I use a wrapper over the "cocci_cc" script and I need to modify one or both scripts to send the cover to the superset of recipients in the constituent commits. Regards, Jim Quinan Broadcom STB > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >