On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:09:15PM +0000, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:28:03PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 07/04/2023 18:04, Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > > >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > >> > > >> Dual license. > > >> > > > > > > What are my choices here? I see this, > > > > > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > > Yes, the one suggested by the checkpatch. Did you run it? > > I don't recall if I did or not. > > > > > > > Which appears to be what your suggesting. I also see this, > > > > > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > > > > I'd rather use the later. > > > > Why? Bindings should be licensed under BSD, so what is the reason to > > make here exception? > > I'm sure I can re-license my submissions. I'd have to look into it. I'm _not_ sure.
