On 10/04/2023 09:11, Delphine_CC_Chiu/WYHQ/Wiwynn wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 4:37 PM
>> To: Delphine_CC_Chiu/WYHQ/Wiwynn <Delphine_CC_Chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> patrick@xxxxxxxxx; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>; Andrew
>> Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ARM: dts: aspeed: greatlakes: Add gpio names
>>
>> Security Reminder: Please be aware that this email is sent by an external
>> sender.
>>
>> On 29/03/2023 10:32, Delphine CC Chiu wrote:
>>> From: Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add GPIO names for SOC lines.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-greatlakes.dts | 49
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-greatlakes.dts
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-greatlakes.dts
>>> index 8c05bd56ce1e..59819115c39d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-greatlakes.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-greatlakes.dts
>>> @@ -238,4 +238,53 @@
>>> &gpio0 {
>>> pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpiu1_default &pinctrl_gpiu7_default>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> Was it disabled before?
>>
> Yes,
Really? Can you provide any proof for this?
> we have to enable gpio status for meeting aspeed-g6 device tree setting, and set net names for pulling gpio pin from application layer.
What is "enable gpio status"? What does it mean to "meet aspeeg-g6
devicetree setting"?
What names have anything to do with my question?
Sorry, I cannot parse it at all.
>>> + gpio-line-names =
>>> + /*A0-A7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*B0-B7*/ "power-bmc-nic","presence-ocp-debug",
>>> + "power-bmc-slot1","power-bmc-slot2",
>>> + "power-bmc-slot3","power-bmc-slot4","","",
>>> + /*C0-C7*/ "presence-ocp-nic","","","reset-cause-nic-primary",
>>> + "reset-cause-nic-secondary","","","",
>>> + /*D0-D7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*E0-E7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*F0-F7*/ "slot1-bmc-reset-button","slot2-bmc-reset-button",
>>> + "slot3-bmc-reset-button","slot4-bmc-reset-button",
>>> + "","","","presence-emmc",
>>> + /*G0-G7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*H0-H7*/ "","","","",
>>> + "presence-mb-slot1","presence-mb-slot2",
>>> + "presence-mb-slot3","presence-mb-slot4",
>>> + /*I0-I7*/ "","","","","","","bb-bmc-button","",
>>> + /*J0-J7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*K0-K7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*L0-L7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*M0-M7*/
>> "","power-nic-bmc-enable","","usb-bmc-enable","","reset-cause-usb-hub","","",
>>> + /*N0-N7*/ "","","","","bmc-ready","","","",
>>> + /*O0-O7*/
>> "","","","","","","fan0-bmc-cpld-enable","fan1-bmc-cpld-enable",
>>> + /*P0-P7*/ "fan2-bmc-cpld-enable","fan3-bmc-cpld-enable",
>>> + "reset-cause-pcie-slot1","reset-cause-pcie-slot2",
>>> + "reset-cause-pcie-slot3","reset-cause-pcie-slot4","","",
>>> + /*Q0-Q7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*R0-R7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*S0-S7*/ "","","power-p5v-usb","presence-bmc-tpm","","","","",
>>> + /*T0-T7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*U0-U7*/ "","","","","","","","GND",
>>> + /*V0-V7*/ "bmc-slot1-ac-button","bmc-slot2-ac-button",
>>> + "bmc-slot3-ac-button","bmc-slot4-ac-button",
>>> + "","","","",
>>> + /*W0-W7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*X0-X7*/ "","","","","","","","",
>>> + /*Y0-Y7*/ "","","","reset-cause-emmc","","","","",
>>> + /*Z0-Z7*/ "","","","","","","",""; };
>>> +
>>> +&gpio1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>
>> Same question...
> Yes, the answer is same as above.
So the same incorrect?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
