On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 07:22:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 12:48:34 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > Due to the wild nature of the Qualcomm RPM Message RAM, we can't really > > use 'reg' to point to the MPM's slice of Message RAM without cutting into > > an already-defined RPM MSG RAM node used for GLINK and SMEM. > > > > Document passing the register space as a slice of SRAM through the > > qcom,rpm-msg-ram property. This also makes 'reg' deprecated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.yaml | 12 +++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,mpm.example.dts:22.35-38.11: Warning (node_name_vs_property_name): /example-0/interrupt-controller: node name and property name conflict Looks like this is colliding with the example template which has to craft an interrupt provider for 'interrupts' properties. Either adding a parent node or using interrupts-extended instead should work-around it. Rob
