Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 0/5] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 4:56 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 21.03.2023 12:25:15, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > A gentle ping to remind you of this series.
> > I have no idea why it hasn't deserved any response for quite some
> > time.
> > Is there anything I am still missing?
>
> I wonder if we want to do a s/master/primary/ in the DT bindings and
> driver?

The ST reference manual (RM0386) explicitly uses the master and slave words
in the bxcan chapter. I would stay consistent with it. But I have no problem
changing it to primary. I just sent v8 with the changes you suggested
for shared irq
and clock enable/disable, but if you prefer to use primary I will send
the v9 version
with that change.
Please let me know your opinion.

Thanks and regards,
Dario

>
> regards,
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129  |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



-- 

Dario Binacchi

Senior Embedded Linux Developer

dario.binacchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

__________________________________


Amarula Solutions SRL

Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT

T. +39 042 243 5310
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

www.amarulasolutions.com




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux