On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 19 November 2014 08:45:58 Rob Herring wrote:
>>> > static inline struct device_node *dev_of_node(struct device *of_node)
>>> > {
>>> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>>> > return NULL;
>>> >
>>> > return dev->of_node;
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > Adding the IS_ENABLED() in a lot of drivers isn't horrible, but we seem
>>> > to be doing it a lot.
>>>
>>> I think you misread things. of_node is always present now, so it
>>> should always be NULL for !CONFIG_OF.
>>>
>>
>> No, I didn't misread it but I should have been clearer with the intention:
>> The idea is to tell the compiler that we know it will be NULL when CONFIG_OF
>> is unset, so it can optimize out all code that does
>>
>> struct device_node *dn = dev_of_node(dev);
>>
>> if (dn) {
>> ...
>> /* complex code */
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> and we can avoid using an #ifdef or if(IS_ENABLED()) in the source to
>> compile out the DT-only sections of a driver.
>
> Oh, right. That would definitely be worthwhile to do.
Agreed.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
