On 23/03/2023 14:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 23/03/2023 06:04, Tao Zhang wrote:
TPDM device need a node to reset the configurations and status of
it. This change provides a node to reset the configurations and
disable the TPDM if it has been enabled.
Please justify why this "do everything" magic knob is required
when there are tunables for individual controls in the later
patches.
Suzuki
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 28
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index 5e1e2ba..104638d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -161,6 +161,33 @@ static void tpdm_datasets_setup(struct
tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
drvdata->datasets |= pidr & GENMASK(TPDM_DATASETS - 1, 0);
}
+static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf,
+ size_t size)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long val;
+ struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
+ if (ret || val != 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+ /* Reset all datasets to ZERO, and init the default data*/
+ tpdm_init_datasets(drvdata);
With the suggested rename in the previous patch, you wouldn't need
a comment here.
+
+ spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
+
+ /* Disable tpdm if enabled */
+ if (drvdata->enable)
+ coresight_disable(drvdata->csdev);
Couldn't this be done via disable_source ? Please don't overload
the sysfs handle.
+
+ return size;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(reset);
Documentation for the sysfs node please ?
Suzuki
