On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:26:47PM -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 01/13/2014 07:25 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: > >> Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> What about putting this into a seperate paragraph prefixed with "Current > >>> Linux specific implementation:"? > >>> > >> This would address my concern quite nicely. > > > > The text should go into Documentation/ not the DT binding. > > > The problem here is that as it stands DT is quite daunting to pick > up. My needs are pretty minimal yet I had to spend many hours sifting > through source, blogs, and Documentation/* to get something that more or > less worked. The bindings are generally well-documented, but there is no > "start here" document in the tree giving conventions and an overview of > how Linux in particular uses DT. > > The closest thing I know of is Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt. > Perhaps this is where the language Wolfram suggested should be placed. I appreciate your effort to improve documentation on how to get started. Sadly, I don't know where the best place would be and I am too busy to look it up. If you are interested, I'll happily apply the outcome, otherwise we sadly have to wait until someone else comes up.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
