Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 01/13/2014 07:25 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: >> Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> What about putting this into a seperate paragraph prefixed with "Current >>> Linux specific implementation:"? >>> >> This would address my concern quite nicely. > > The text should go into Documentation/ not the DT binding. > The problem here is that as it stands DT is quite daunting to pick up. My needs are pretty minimal yet I had to spend many hours sifting through source, blogs, and Documentation/* to get something that more or less worked. The bindings are generally well-documented, but there is no "start here" document in the tree giving conventions and an overview of how Linux in particular uses DT. The closest thing I know of is Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt. Perhaps this is where the language Wolfram suggested should be placed. Cheers, - Ben
Attachment:
pgpL7Q7glNWgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
