On 3/22/2023 3:51 PM, Robert Marko wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:19, Manikanta Mylavarapu
<quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/7/2023 9:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Why exactly do you need a new driver for this instead of extending
existing PIL? I feel all this is growing because no one wants to touch
existing code and merge with it...
Previously we raised patch to add secure-pil to existing rproc driver.
Bjorn suggested to introduce a new secure-pil driver.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1611984013-10201-3-git-send-email-gokulsri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Also IPQ5018, IPQ9574 soc's follows multipd model. So we decided to
have new driver which consists 'secure-pil + multi pd' in one
place.
Would it be possible to have IPQ8074 and IPQ6018 support in it as well?
Cause, those are supported by ath11k but remoteproc support is missing,
I have been upstreaming parts for IPQ8074 for years now and it is usable but
we are still missing remoteproc.
Regards,
Robert
>>
Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.
Yes. It's possible. Currently we added support for IPQ5018, IPQ9574.
In subsequent patches, we will add IPQ8074, IPQ6018 & IPQ5332 support
as well.
Regards,
Manikanta.
