On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:19, Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 3/7/2023 9:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Why exactly do you need a new driver for this instead of extending > > existing PIL? I feel all this is growing because no one wants to touch > > existing code and merge with it... > > Previously we raised patch to add secure-pil to existing rproc driver. > Bjorn suggested to introduce a new secure-pil driver. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1611984013-10201-3-git-send-email-gokulsri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > Also IPQ5018, IPQ9574 soc's follows multipd model. So we decided to > have new driver which consists 'secure-pil + multi pd' in one > place. Would it be possible to have IPQ8074 and IPQ6018 support in it as well? Cause, those are supported by ath11k but remoteproc support is missing, I have been upstreaming parts for IPQ8074 for years now and it is usable but we are still missing remoteproc. Regards, Robert > > Thanks & Regards, > Manikanta.
