On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:47:36 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Andre
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> index 7038f47d77ff..dc76537f1b62 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void __init sun6i_rtc_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
> }
>
> /* Switch to the external, more precise, oscillator, if present */
> - if (of_get_property(node, "clocks", NULL)) {
> + if (of_property_present(node, "clocks")) {
> reg |= SUN6I_LOSC_CTRL_EXT_OSC;
> if (rtc->data->has_losc_en)
> reg |= SUN6I_LOSC_CTRL_EXT_LOSC_EN;
