Hi Srinivas, srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:12:24 +0000: > On 22/02/2023 17:22, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > @@ -1791,11 +1792,15 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, > > if (!nvmem) > > return -EINVAL; > > > + /* Cells with read_post_process hook may realloc buffer we can't allow here */ > > + if (info->read_post_process) > > + return -EINVAL; > This should probably go in 1/4 patch. Other than that series looks good to me. FYI patch 1/4 is also carried by the nvmem-layouts series, so it's probably best to keep these 2 patches separated to simplify the merging. Thanks, Miquèl
