On 22/02/2023 17:22, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
This should probably go in 1/4 patch. Other than that series looks good to me.@@ -1791,11 +1792,15 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, if (!nvmem) return -EINVAL;+ /* Cells with read_post_process hook may realloc buffer we can't allow here */+ if (info->read_post_process) + return -EINVAL;
--srini