On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 08:51:49 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 04:36:41PM +0800, Hal Feng wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:46:26 +0800, Hal Feng wrote: >> > This patch series adds basic clock, reset & DT support for StarFive >> > JH7110 SoC. Patch 17 depends on series [1] which provides pinctrl >> > dt-bindings. Patch 19 depends on series [2] which provides dt-bindings >> > of VisionFive 2 board and JH7110 SoC. >> > >> > You can simply review or test the patches at the link [3]. >> > >> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230209143702.44408-1-hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230216131511.3327943-1-conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> > [3]: https://github.com/hal-feng/linux/commits/visionfive2-minimal >> >> Hi Conor, >> >> When I tried to rebase these patches on v6.3-rc1, I found the kernel >> would crash on the VisionFive 2 board during startup. The logs are as >> below. I checkout the branch to the mainline and found that the kernel >> would also crash on the VisionFive board which is equipped with JH7100 >> SoC. >> >> -------------------------------- >> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000004cccccccd4 >> Oops [#1] >> Modules linked in: >> CPU: 3 PID: 87 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.3.0-rc1-00019-g239e7809f291 #305 >> Hardware name: StarFive VisionFive 2 v1.3B (DT) >> epc : enqueue_timer+0x18/0x90 >> ra : internal_add_timer+0x2c/0x38 >> epc : ffffffff8006a714 ra : ffffffff8006a7b8 sp : ffffffc80443bc80 >> gp : ffffffff80eb5100 tp : ffffffd8c01db200 t0 : 0000000000000000 >> t1 : 000000000000000f t2 : 0000000038b3ea28 s0 : ffffffc80443bcb0 >> s1 : ffffffff80813940 a0 : ffffffff80813940 a1 : ffffffc80443bd48 >> a2 : 000000000000020b a3 : cccccccd0b000000 a4 : cccccccccccccccc >> a5 : 000000000000020b a6 : ffffffff80814a08 a7 : 0000000000000001 >> s2 : ffffffc80443bd48 s3 : 0000000008400040 s4 : ffffffff80813940 >> s5 : ffffffff80eea0b8 s6 : ffffffff80eb7220 s7 : 0000000000000040 >> s8 : ffffffff80eb61e0 s9 : 0000002ac84a2548 s10: 0000002ad53e92c0 >> s11: 0000000000000001 t3 : 000000000000003f t4 : 0000000000000000 >> t5 : 0000000000000004 t6 : 0000000000000003 >> status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000004cccccccd4 cause: 000000000000000f >> [<ffffffff8006a714>] enqueue_timer+0x18/0x90 >> [<ffffffff8006aa64>] add_timer_on+0xf0/0x134 >> [<ffffffff80500f18>] try_to_generate_entropy+0x1ec/0x232 >> [<ffffffff8035a636>] urandom_read_iter+0x42/0xc2 >> [<ffffffff800fff16>] vfs_read+0x17c/0x1e4 >> [<ffffffff801005b6>] ksys_read+0x78/0x98 >> [<ffffffff801005e4>] sys_read+0xe/0x16 >> [<ffffffff800035dc>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2 >> Code: 9381 9713 0037 0813 0705 983a 3703 0008 e198 c311 (e70c) d713 >> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- >> note: udevd[87] exited with irqs disabled >> Segmentation fault >> FAIL >> Saving random seed: >> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: >> rcu: 1-...0: (0 ticks this GP) idle=19c4/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=42/42 fqs=7474 >> rcu: (detected by 2, t=15005 jiffies, g=-195, q=35 ncpus=4) >> Task dump for CPU 1: >> task:dd state:R running task stack:0 pid:92 ppid:88 flags:0x00000008 >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff80003764>] ret_from_fork+0x0/0xc >> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: >> rcu: 1-...0: (0 ticks this GP) idle=19c4/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=42/42 fqs=29814 >> rcu: (detected by 2, t=60018 jiffies, g=-195, q=35 ncpus=4) >> Task dump for CPU 1: >> task:dd state:R running task stack:0 pid:92 ppid:88 flags:0x00000008 >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff80003764>] ret_from_fork+0x0/0xc >> ... >> -------------------------------- >> >> I used 'git bisect' and found out the commit 9493e6f3ce02 is the >> cause. I tried to revert this commit on the tag v6.3-rc1, but it >> seems there is no improvement. > > Hmm, I'm not entirely sure that that is a good bisect. > This is a fix for my stupidity in the commit you mention: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230302174154.970746-1-conor@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > But the main backtrace there is not from that patch at all, I think it > is Linus' fault. > The HEAD of Linus' tree is currently 8ca09d5fa3549 ("cpumask: fix > incorrect cpumask scanning result checks") should be a fix for the > backtrace that you are seeing above. > >> Any options I am missing? Could you please give me some suggestions >> to adapt to the new changes between 6.2 and 6.3? Thank you in >> advance. > > LMK if the above two things don't fix it for you & I'll go digging > tonight. The above two methods can fix the problem. Here are my test results. The VisionFive board can boot up successfully if and only if all above two applied. The VisionFive 2 board can boot up successfully if I merge Linus's new changes. Hope your fix will be merged in rc2. Thank you for your reply. Best regards, Hal
