On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 11:57, Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add USB phy and controller related nodes > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi > index 2bb4053..319b5bd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi > @@ -215,6 +215,98 @@ > #size-cells = <1>; > ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>; > > + ssphy_0: ssphy@7D000 { > + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-usb3-phy"; > + reg = <0x7D000 0x1C4>; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_AUX_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>; > + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb"; > + > + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_BCR>, > + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_0_PHY_BCR>; > + reset-names = "phy","common"; > + status = "disabled"; > + > + usb0_ssphy: lane@7D200 { Please use newer style device bindings for new PHYs. > + reg = <0x0007D200 0x130>, /* Tx */ > + <0x0007D400 0x200>, /* Rx */ > + <0x0007D800 0x1F8>, /* PCS */ > + <0x0007D600 0x044>; /* PCS misc */ > + #phy-cells = <0>; > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PIPE_CLK>; > + clock-names = "pipe0"; > + clock-output-names = "gcc_usb0_pipe_clk_src"; No, this clock doesn't originate from gcc, so the gcc prefix is incorrect. > + }; > + }; > + > + qusb_phy_0: qusb@7B000 { > + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qusb2-phy"; > + reg = <0x07B000 0x180>; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > + > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>, > + <&xo_board_clk>; > + clock-names = "cfg_ahb", "ref"; > + > + resets = <&gcc GCC_QUSB2_0_PHY_BCR>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + usb3: usb3@8A00000 { You know the drill. This node is in the wrong place. > + compatible = "qcom,dwc3"; > + reg = <0x8AF8800 0x400>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_SLEEP_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>; > + > + clock-names = "sys_noc_axi", > + "anoc_axi", > + "master", > + "sleep", > + "mock_utmi"; Please fix the indentation of the lists. > + > + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_SNOC_USB_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_ANOC_USB_AXI_CLK>, Why do you assign clock rates to the NOC clocks? Should they be set using the interconnect instead? > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_MASTER_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>; > + assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>, > + <200000000>, > + <200000000>, > + <24000000>; > + > + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB_BCR>; > + status = "disabled"; > + > + dwc_0: dwc3@8A00000 { > + compatible = "snps,dwc3"; > + reg = <0x8A00000 0xcd00>; > + clock-names = "ref"; > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB0_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>; clocks before clock-names > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 140 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + phys = <&qusb_phy_0>, <&usb0_ssphy>; > + phy-names = "usb2-phy", "usb3-phy"; > + tx-fifo-resize; > + snps,dis_ep_cache_eviction; > + snps,is-utmi-l1-suspend; > + snps,hird-threshold = /bits/ 8 <0x0>; > + snps,dis_u2_susphy_quirk; > + snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk; > + snps,quirk-frame-length-adjustment = <0x0A87F0A0>; > + dr_mode = "host"; > + }; > + }; > + > pcie0_phy: phy@84000 { > compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy"; > reg = <0x00084000 0x1bc>; /* Serdes PLL */ > -- > 2.7.4 > -- With best wishes Dmitry