Hi Alexander,
On 23-02-27, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Add FlexSPI node for i.MX93.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is mainly taken from the downstream kernel with the clock order
> fixed and 'nxp,imx93-fspi' compatible removed.
> I do not know if it makes sense to add an imx93 specific compatible or
> not. imx8mn uses imx8mm only, but imx8mp has it's own. But the latter
> uses the same device data in the driver.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
> index 3c3d3d570d8c..1d71ca8d1f5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
> @@ -458,6 +458,21 @@ flexcan2: can@425b0000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + flexspi1: spi@425e0000 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "nxp,imx8mm-fspi";
> + reg = <0x425e0000 0x10000>, <0x28000000 0x10000000>;
The compatible should always be the first entry, followed by reg.
Regards,
Marco
> + reg-names = "fspi_base", "fspi_mmap";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 55 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clk IMX93_CLK_FLEXSPI1_GATE>,
> + <&clk IMX93_CLK_FLEXSPI1_GATE>;
> + clock-names = "fspi_en", "fspi";
> + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX93_CLK_FLEXSPI1>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX93_CLK_SYS_PLL_PFD1>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> lpuart7: serial@42690000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx93-lpuart", "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart";
> reg = <0x42690000 0x1000>;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
