On 23/02/2023 21:59, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:48 PM Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thursday 23 February 2023 14:22:52 Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, Pali Rohár wrote: >>>> >>>>> Allow to define inverted logic (0 - enable LED, 1 - disable LED) via >>>>> active-low property. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml | 5 +++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> Needs a DT Ack (now Cc:ed) >>> >>> I can't do anything with this set until we have a DT Ack. >>> >>> If you don't receive one soon, I'd suggest resending the set again with >>> all of the DT people on Cc that it should have been sent to in the first >>> place. >> >> (Re)Sending one email multiple times is against email etiquette, >> moreover it is spam technique and reason for marking sender on the >> blacklist. > > No problem on the kernel mailing lists actually, we love to mail > bomb each other here. Yeah maybe we are a bit weird :/ > >> Moreover I have already sent it more than one time. DT people are known >> to not respond to patches and pull requests and I have no motivation to >> send reminder emails for them for more than half of year. Is this a joke? You got here response within one day! Sent: 18th of August Reviewed-by: 19th of August https://lore.kernel.org/all/f635d5a7-6817-cd62-e395-63e346775716@xxxxxxxxxx/ You ignored the tag and then ignored the process and not Cc'ed us. Yet you complain that someone did not respond to your emails. Really? >> >> So I would suggest to not send emails to people who just do not want to >> receive or read emails. It is logical reaction. >> >> This patch is here for more than 6 months, so I do not see reason why to >> wait for Godot. Rather move forward than stepping at the same position. > > I understand that it is annoying. > > In my experience Krzysztof and Rob (now added on To) are usually > quite responsive and helpful, so something must have made them > miss it I think. > > As subsystem maintainer, if the DT reviewers haven't said anything > in ~2 weeks I tend to sanity check the binding as best I can and then > merge it. The bigger and more complex it is the more hesitant I get to > do this... Yeah... this patch was never sent to us, thus regardless how hard we work, it would be quite difficult to answer emails which we never received. Best regards, Krzysztof
