Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/8] dt-bindings: leds: register-bit-led: Add active-low property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 5:48 PM Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 23 February 2023 14:22:52 Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > > Allow to define inverted logic (0 - enable LED, 1 - disable LED) via
> > > > active-low property.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/register-bit-led.yaml | 5 +++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Needs a DT Ack (now Cc:ed)
> >
> > I can't do anything with this set until we have a DT Ack.
> >
> > If you don't receive one soon, I'd suggest resending the set again with
> > all of the DT people on Cc that it should have been sent to in the first
> > place.
>
> (Re)Sending one email multiple times is against email etiquette,
> moreover it is spam technique and reason for marking sender on the
> blacklist.

No problem on the kernel mailing lists actually, we love to mail
bomb each other here. Yeah maybe we are a bit weird :/

> Moreover I have already sent it more than one time. DT people are known
> to not respond to patches and pull requests and I have no motivation to
> send reminder emails for them for more than half of year.
>
> So I would suggest to not send emails to people who just do not want to
> receive or read emails. It is logical reaction.
>
> This patch is here for more than 6 months, so I do not see reason why to
> wait for Godot. Rather move forward than stepping at the same position.

I understand that it is annoying.

In my experience Krzysztof and Rob (now added on To) are usually
quite responsive and helpful, so something must have made them
miss it I think.

As subsystem maintainer, if the DT reviewers haven't said anything
in ~2 weeks I tend to sanity check the binding as best I can and then
merge it. The bigger and more complex it is the more hesitant I get to
do this...

Yours,
Linus Walleij




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux