On 2/23/23 10:25 AM, Colin Foster wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote:
Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and
the Phytec PCM-959 development kit.
Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v4
* New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml
How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make
the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this
series?
Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk
off devices one at a time?
If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple
rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable)
this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit
before you sent your patch set.
Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following:
1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit.
2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done
it should be an easy rebase before submission.
3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update.
I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your
priorities list.
Low priority for me, I'd suggest #1 or they probably will not be
converted anytime soon.
Andrew
