On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: > On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote: > > Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and > > the Phytec PCM-959 development kit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > v4 > > * New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> > > > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml > > How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make > the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this > series? Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk off devices one at a time? If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable) this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit before you sent your patch set. Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following: 1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit. 2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done it should be an easy rebase before submission. 3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update. I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your priorities list.
