Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 System-Top-Group clock and reset generator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/02/2023 14:01, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> On 2023/2/21 19:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/02/2023 09:33, Xingyu Wu wrote:
>>> Add bindings for the System-Top-Group clock and reset generator (STGCRG)
>>> on the JH7110 RISC-V SoC by StarFive Ltd.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>> +    };
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 93eb504c3b21..2e70c9f21989 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -19914,6 +19914,7 @@ F:	arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/
>>>  STARFIVE JH71X0 CLOCK DRIVERS
>>>  M:	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>
>>>  M:	Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +M:	Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> No improvements here. You add here new bindings for one device and then
>> - without explanation - add yourself to all Starfive clock bindings.
>> Either explain it or drop it or move it to separate patch.
>>
>> You already got comment for this.
>>
> 
> Sorry, I didn't understand what you meant before. Now my understanding is that, 
> If I improvements JH71X0 driver no JH7110 driver, I could add this here. Right?
> 
> Is it OK if I do it this way to move it to separate patch like this?:
> +STARFIVE JH7110 STG CLOCK DRIVERS
> +M:	Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If you want to be the maintainer of all drivers, add separate commit for
this, so this is obvious. Or at least explain this change in commit msg.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux