On 01/02/2023 04:09, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Balsam, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/UPDATE-20230131-234122/bchihi-baylibre-com/thermal-drivers-mediatek-Relocate-driver-to-mediatek-folder/20230124-211910 > base: the 4th patch of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230124131717.128660-5-bchihi%40baylibre.com > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230131153816.21709-1-bchihi%40baylibre.com > patch subject: [PATCH v12] thermal: drivers: mediatek: Add the Low Voltage Thermal Sensor driver > config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230201/202302011058.17Vvc1pN-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/5646ebf6f10ff0fc60c04d8c57523f7c44526b41 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review UPDATE-20230131-234122/bchihi-baylibre-com/thermal-drivers-mediatek-Relocate-driver-to-mediatek-folder/20230124-211910 > git checkout 5646ebf6f10ff0fc60c04d8c57523f7c44526b41 > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c:20:10: fatal error: dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek,lvts-thermal.h: No such file or directory > 20 | #include <dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek,lvts-thermal.h> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So here is your driver... and you decided not only to make reviewers life more difficult, but also to fail all automated tools. No, that's not how patchsets should be sent. You have here clear dependency, you cannot send them separately. Best regards, Krzysztof
