On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:11:40PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:56:50PM +0100, Beniamino Galvani wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 10:17:12AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I noticed that the handling of /CS was done in the spifc_txrx() function > > > - will this do the right thing if the transfer needs to be split for the > > > buffer size? > > > It should. When the transfer gets split, CS is kept active for all the > > chunks and the value of CS after that depends on the value of > > cs_change. > > Can you be more specific about how that works? I'm just not seeing the > code that handles this. It's this: static int meson_spifc_txrx(struct meson_spifc *spifc, struct spi_transfer *xfer, int offset, int len, bool last_xfer, bool last_chunk) { bool keep_cs = true; [...] if (last_chunk) { if (last_xfer) keep_cs = xfer->cs_change; else keep_cs = !xfer->cs_change; } regmap_update_bits(spifc->regmap, REG_USER4, USER4_CS_ACT, keep_cs ? USER4_CS_ACT : 0); /* start transfer */ [...] } The USER4_CS_ACT bit specifies if CS must be kept active after the transfer. > > > > + if (!ret && xfer->delay_usecs) > > > > + udelay(xfer->delay_usecs); > > > > The core will do this for you if you implement this as transfer_one(). > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that transfer_one() can't > > be used in this case. The hardware doesn't support direct manipulation > > of CS and allows only to specify if CS must be kept active after the > > current transfer. So I need to know for each transfer if it's the last > > and this can be achieved only implementing transfer_one_message(). > > This is already in a function that's operating at the transfer_one() > level, the function is even called transfer_one() and besides it's > clearly not something specific to this hardware so should be factored > out into the core instead of open coded. A way to simplify this at core level could be to add a 'last' flag to the spi_transfer structure and populate it before calling transfer_one_message(); in this way, drivers that need to know the position of the transfer in the message in order to properly handle CS can use the generic version of transfer_one_message() instead of reimplementing it. It seems that other existing drivers probably can benefit from this. Beniamino -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html