The MIPI and DisplayPort phys are actually part of the Power Management Unit system controller, thus allow them as its children, instead of specifying as separate device nodes with syscon phandle. Dependencies ============ If entire patchset is okay, then it can go via separate trees: A. I will take first soc patch. B. phy patches #2-#5 are independent and can go via phy tree. C. DTS patches depend on (B above), thus they will wait one cycle and get applied later. Best regards, Krzysztof Krzysztof Kozlowski (8): dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: allow phys as child dt-bindings: phy: samsung,dp-video-phy: deprecate syscon phandle dt-bindings: phy: samsung,mipi-video-phy: deprecate syscon phandle phy: samsung,dp-video-phy: deprecate syscon phandle phy: samsung,mipi-video-phy: deprecate syscon phandle ARM: dts: exynos: move DP and MIPI phys to PMU node in Exynos5420 ARM: dts: exynos: move DP and MIPI phys to PMU node in Exynos5250 arm64: dts: exynos: move MIPI phy to PMU node in Exynos5433 .../bindings/phy/samsung,dp-video-phy.yaml | 5 +- .../bindings/phy/samsung,mipi-video-phy.yaml | 11 ++- .../bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.yaml | 71 +++++++++++++++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 24 +++---- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 24 +++---- arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 19 +++-- drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos-dp-video.c | 7 +- drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos-mipi-video.c | 7 +- 8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1
