Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/22] ASoC: qcom: Add USB backend ASoC driver for Q6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/25/23 21:14, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Create a USB BE component that will register a new USB port to the ASoC USB
> framework.  This will handle determination on if the requested audio
> profile is supported by the USB device currently selected.

Can you clarify how? because ...


> +static struct snd_soc_dai_driver q6usb_be_dais[] = {
> +	{
> +		.playback = {
> +			.stream_name = "USB BE RX",
> +			.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_11025 |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050 |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100 |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000 |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000,
> +			.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_BE |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_BE |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_BE |
> +				SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_BE,
> +			.channels_min = 1,
> +			.channels_max = 2,
> +			.rate_max =     192000,
> +			.rate_min =	8000,
> +		},
> +		.id = USB_RX,
> +		.name = "USB_RX_BE",
> +		.ops = &q6usb_ops,
> +	},
> +};

... here I see a single DAI, so presumably ONE endpoint can be supported?

I didn't see in the rest of the code how a card with multiple endpoint
would be rejected, nor how the capabilities are checked?




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux