On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:42:59PM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Nice to see this posted! Thanks for doing so.
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx>
>
> Care to give a brief patch description?
Bah, I've managed to screw this! I will add a description, of course.
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/juno.dts | 374 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/juno.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile
> > index f8001a6..0100eca 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_THUNDER) += thunder-88xx.dtb
> > -dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dtb foundation-v8.dtb
> > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS) += rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dtb foundation-v8.dtb juno.dtb
>
> We've applied the series that creates subdirectories per vendor, so
> this won't apply. Care to respin on top of our next/cleanup branch?
Sure, will do.
>
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_XGENE) += apm-mustang.dtb
> >
> > targets += dtbs
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/juno.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/juno.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..7f998de
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/juno.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
> > +/*
> > + * ARM Ltd. Juno Plaform
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Juno";
>
> This could probably be a bit more descriptive.
I will add something to the tune: "ARM Juno development board (r0)" ? Not sure
that the format usually is.
>
> > + compatible = "arm,juno", "arm,vexpress";
> > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > + aliases {
> > + serial0 = &soc_uart0;
> > + };
> > +
> > + cpus {
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + A53_0:cpu@100 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53","arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x100>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + };
> > +
> > + A53_1:cpu@101 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53","arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x101>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + };
> > +
> > + A53_2:cpu@102 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53","arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x102>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + };
> > +
> > + A53_3:cpu@103 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53","arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x103>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + };
> > +
> > + A57_0:cpu@0 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57","arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + };
> > +
> > + A57_1:cpu@1 {
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a57","arm,armv8";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x1>;
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + };
>
> These cpus are not ordered by reg, they probably should be (i.e. 57s
> before 53s).
That's because the A53s are the boot cluster. And yes, HW guys though it
was fun to confuse people by making the little cluster second in line.
Is that a hard requirement to order by reg or can I keep the current
order? AFAIK (but I need to check tomorrow with the board) the boot
code gets confused if the first node is not the boot node.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + memory@80000000 {
> > + device_type = "memory";
> > + /* last 16MB of the first memory area is reserved for secure world use by firmware */
> > + reg = <0x00000000 0x80000000 0x0 0x7f000000>,
> > + <0x00000008 0x80000000 0x1 0x80000000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + gic: interrupt-controller@2c001000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,gic-400", "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x2c010000 0 0x1000>,
> > + <0x0 0x2c02f000 0 0x2000>,
> > + <0x0 0x2c04f000 0 0x2000>,
> > + <0x0 0x2c06f000 0 0x2000>;
> > + #address-cells = <0>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + timer {
> > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> > + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
> > + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
> > + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
> > + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + pmu {
> > + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 02 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 06 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + psci {
> > + compatible = "arm,psci-0.2";
> > + method = "smc";
> > + };
>
> This dt is just a pile of nodes in a flat directory today. You're not
> the first to add psci at toplevel, but it'd be nice to do some sort of
> structure for this at some point.
I agree and apologise for the linear dump. I know that there are other
platform coming but I don't have enough details on what parts are going
to end up being common and what not.
As for psci, should I create a small include file that contains just the
psci node and include that?
>
> Same for the timer and pmu nodes, they should probably go somewhere
> else than the top.
OK, I will try to break this DT in pieces.
>
> > +
> > + /* SoC fixed clocks */
> > + soc_uartclk: refclk72738khz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <7273800>;
> > + clock-output-names = "juno:uartclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc_usb48mhz: clk48mhz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <48000000>;
> > + clock-output-names = "clk48mhz";
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc_smc50mhz: clk50mhz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <50000000>;
> > + clock-output-names = "smc_clk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc_refclk100mhz: refclk100mhz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <100000000>;
> > + clock-output-names = "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc_faxiclk: refclk533mhz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <533000000>;
> > + clock-output-names = "faxi_clk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + mb_eth25mhz: clk25mhz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <25000000>;
> > + clock-output-names = "ethclk25mhz";
> > + };
> > +
> > + memory-controller@7ffd0000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl354", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0 0x7ffd0000 0 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 87 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + dma0: dma@7ff00000 {
>
> We're trying to encourate DT contents to be sorted per unit address /
> reg, to cause fewer conflicts when new stuff is added. Care to reorder
> the devices based on that?
Absolutely, sorry for the mistake.
>
>
> > + compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x7ff00000 0 0x1000>;
> > + #dma-cells = <1>;
> > + #dma-channels = <8>;
> > + #dma-requests = <32>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 88 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 91 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 108 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 109 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 110 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 111 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_faxiclk>;
> > + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc_uart0: uart@7ff80000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x7ff80000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_uartclk>, <&soc_refclk100mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + ulpi_phy: phy@0 {
> > + compatible = "phy-ulpi-generic";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x94 0x0 0x4>;
> > + phy-id = <0>;
> > + };
>
> phy@0? Hmm. Doesn't seem to belong in the same address space as
> everything else here.
And the bindings are not defined either. I wonder if I need to define
this at all after my patch to add the SMSC USB334x PHY ID. Will check
tomorrow when I have access to the board.
Thanks for reviewing this!
Best regards,
Liviu
>
>
> > +
> > + ehci@7ffc0000 {
> > + compatible = "generic-ehci";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x7ffc0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 117 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_usb48mhz>;
> > + phys = <&ulpi_phy>;
> > + phy-names = "usb_ulpi";
> > + };
> > +
> > + ohci@7ffb0000 {
> > + compatible = "generic-ohci";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x7ffb0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 116 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_usb48mhz>;
> > + phys = <&ulpi_phy>;
> > + phy-names = "usb_ulpi";
> > + };
> > +
> > + i2c@7ffa0000 {
> > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x7ffa0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 104 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > + i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <500>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > +
> > + dvi0: dvi-transmitter@70 {
> > + compatible = "nxp,tda998x";
> > + reg = <0x70>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + dvi1: dvi-transmitter@71 {
> > + compatible = "nxp,tda998x";
> > + reg = <0x71>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + smb {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges = <0 0 0 0x08000000 0x04000000>,
> > + <1 0 0 0x14000000 0x04000000>,
> > + <2 0 0 0x18000000 0x04000000>,
> > + <3 0 0 0x1c000000 0x04000000>,
> > + <4 0 0 0x0c000000 0x04000000>,
> > + <5 0 0 0x10000000 0x04000000>;
> > +
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 15>;
> > + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 &gic 0 68 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 1 &gic 0 69 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 2 &gic 0 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 3 &gic 0 160 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 4 &gic 0 161 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 5 &gic 0 162 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 6 &gic 0 163 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 7 &gic 0 164 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 8 &gic 0 165 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 9 &gic 0 166 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 10 &gic 0 167 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 11 &gic 0 168 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <0 0 12 &gic 0 169 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +
> > + mb_clk24mhz: clk24mhz {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> > + clock-output-names = "juno_mb:clk24mhz";
> > + };
> > +
> > + motherboard {
> > + compatible = "arm,vexpress,v2p-p1", "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <2>; /* SMB chipselect number and offset */
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges;
> > + model = "V2M-Juno";
> > + arm,hbi = <0x252>;
> > + arm,vexpress,site = <0>;
> > + arm,v2m-memory-map = "rs1";
> > +
> > + mb_fixed_3v3: fixedregulator@0 {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "MCC_SB_3V3";
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + };
> > +
> > + ethernet@2,00000000 {
> > + compatible = "smsc,lan9118", "smsc,lan9115";
> > + reg = <2 0x00000000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <3>;
> > + phy-mode = "mii";
> > + reg-io-width = <4>;
> > + smsc,irq-active-high;
> > + smsc,irq-push-pull;
> > + clocks = <&mb_eth25mhz>;
> > + vdd33a-supply = <&mb_fixed_3v3>;
> > + vddvario-supply = <&mb_fixed_3v3>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + usb@5,00000000 {
> > + compatible = "nxp,usb-isp1763";
> > + reg = <5 0x00000000 0x20000>;
> > + bus-width = <16>;
> > + interrupts = <4>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + iofpga@3,00000000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,amba-bus", "simple-bus";
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges = <0 3 0 0x200000>;
> > +
> > + mmci@050000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl180", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x050000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <5>;
> > + /* cd-gpios = <&v2m_mmc_gpios 0 0>;
> > + wp-gpios = <&v2m_mmc_gpios 1 0>; */
> > + max-frequency = <12000000>;
> > + vmmc-supply = <&mb_fixed_3v3>;
> > + clocks = <&mb_clk24mhz>, <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "mclk", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + kmi@060000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl050", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x060000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <8>;
> > + clocks = <&mb_clk24mhz>, <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "KMIREFCLK", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + kmi@070000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl050", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x070000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <8>;
> > + clocks = <&mb_clk24mhz>, <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "KMIREFCLK", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + wdt@0f0000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,sp805", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x0f0000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <7>;
> > + clocks = <&mb_clk24mhz>, <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "wdogclk", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + v2m_timer01: timer@110000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x110000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <9>;
> > + clocks = <&mb_clk24mhz>, <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "timclken1", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + v2m_timer23: timer@120000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,sp804", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x120000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <9>;
> > + clocks = <&mb_clk24mhz>, <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "timclken1", "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > +
> > + rtc@170000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl031", "arm,primecell";
> > + reg = <0x170000 0x10000>;
> > + interrupts = <0>;
> > + clocks = <&soc_smc50mhz>;
> > + clock-names = "apb_pclk";
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > --
> > 2.1.3
> >
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
