On 14/01/2023 04:17, William Zhang wrote: >>> I >>> know there are usage like that but when we have clear knowledge of the >>> IP block with rev info, I think it is much better to have a precise SoC >> >> No, it's not particularly better and you were questioning it just before... >> > Better than using the very old specific chip model number to bind all > other new chips while I have a chance to update the doc now. It will be used to bind them anyway, it's already an ABI. > I guess we > have to agree to disagree. Enough discussion and I will send out v2 next > week. Thanks for the review. > >>> model number and a general revision info in the compatible. As you know >>> they are many usage of IP rev info in the compatible too. >>> brcm,bcm6328-hsspi will stay so it does not break any existing dts >>> reference to that. >> >> Anyway your ship sailed - you already have bindings using SoC versions... As I said here... Best regards, Krzysztof
