On 09/01/2023 00:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 06/01/2023 17:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 04/01/2023 10:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Document the SM8550 DSI PHY which is very close from the 7nm
and 5nm DSI PHYs found in earlier platforms.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
index bffd161fedfd..f72727f81076 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ allOf:
properties:
compatible:
enum:
+ - qcom,dsi-phy-4nm-8550
- qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350
- qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450
Poor patterns once allowed like to keep growing... I commented here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ccbb47e4-d780-0b1d-814e-27e86b6c369c@xxxxxxxxxx/
so let's wait for response about other compatibles.
I have fixed 8350 & 8450 while applying. Please rebase on top of msm-next-lumag-next with fixed compatibles.
Ack
Thanks,
Neil
Note: the DPU changes are not yet part of the msm-lumag-next.
- qcom,dsi-phy-7nm
Best regards,
Krzysztof
