Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: document the SM8550 DSI PHY

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/01/2023 17:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/01/2023 10:08, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > Document the SM8550 DSI PHY which is very close from the 7nm
> > and 5nm DSI PHYs found in earlier platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> > index bffd161fedfd..f72727f81076 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ allOf:
> >   properties:
> >     compatible:
> >       enum:
> > +      - qcom,dsi-phy-4nm-8550
> >         - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350
> >         - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450
>
> Poor patterns once allowed like to keep growing... I commented here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ccbb47e4-d780-0b1d-814e-27e86b6c369c@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> so let's wait for response about other compatibles.

I have fixed 8350 & 8450 while applying. Please rebase on top of 
msm-next-lumag-next with fixed compatibles.

Note: the DPU changes are not yet part of the msm-lumag-next.

> >         - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

--
With best wishes
Dmitry