Hi Linus,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 2:17 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:32 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch series add support for controlling output disable function using sysfs.
>
> What's wrong with using the debugfs approach Drew implemented in
> commit 6199f6becc869d30ca9394ca0f7a484bf9d598eb
> "pinctrl: pinmux: Add pinmux-select debugfs file"
> ?
I think the main difference is that debugfs is meant for debugging
and development features, while this feature is to be configured on
production systems. There's just no existing API for it.
> Something driver specific seems like a bit of a hack, does it not?
>
> If this should go into sysfs we should probably create something
> generic, such as a list of stuff to be exported as sysfs switches.
>
> It generally also looks really dangerous, which is another reason
> for keeping it in debugfs. It's the big hammer to hurt yourself with,
> more or less.
Yes, generic would be nice. Anyone familiar with other hardware
that could make use of this?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
