Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2022, 11:46:36 CET schrieb ty: > Dear Kozlowski, > > Sorry that we didn't fully get the idea in your previous comments. > > > > > On 21/12/2022 06:52, Yuteng Zhong wrote: > > > from: DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > LubanCat 1 is a Rockchip RK3566 SBC based > > > is developed by EmbedFire Electronics Co., Ltd. > > > Mini Linux Card Type Cheap Computer Development Board > > > > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > > > It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my > > feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. > > Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all > > requested changes or keep discussing them. > > > > Thank you. > > Your pervious comment were: > > > Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission > > process: > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586 > > So I think there must be something wrong in the message but I didn't > notice. This message has a `from` line, and the body was wrapped at 75 > columns. Please help me make it better. > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuteng Zhong <zonyitoo@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml > > > index 88ff4422a8c1..84d39a3a8843 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml > > > @@ -781,6 +781,11 @@ properties: > > > - const: rockchip,rk3568-bpi-r2pro > > > - const: rockchip,rk3568 > > > > > > + - description: EmbedFire LubanCat 1 > > > + items: > > > + - const: embedfire,lubancat-1 > > > + - const: rockchip,rk3566 > > > > Here as well. > > This change was addressing the previous comment in V2: > > > This is separate patch. Does not look like properly ordered. Don't add > > stuff at the end of files/lists. for context sorting order in that file is alphabetical by description Heiko