On 21/12/2022 11:46, ty wrote: > Dear Kozlowski, > > Sorry that we didn't fully get the idea in your previous comments. > >> >> On 21/12/2022 06:52, Yuteng Zhong wrote: >>> from: DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> LubanCat 1 is a Rockchip RK3566 SBC based >>> is developed by EmbedFire Electronics Co., Ltd. >>> Mini Linux Card Type Cheap Computer Development Board >> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >> >> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my >> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. >> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all >> requested changes or keep discussing them. >> >> Thank you. > > Your pervious comment were: > >> Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission >> process: >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586 > > So I think there must be something wrong in the message but I didn't > notice. This message has a `from` line, and the body was wrapped at 75 > columns. Please help me make it better. You do not wrap at 75, but at some other place. Just put it to editor and check where is wrapping (count characters). > > > >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yuteng Zhong <zonyitoo@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: DHDAXCW <lasstp5011@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++++ >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml >>> index 88ff4422a8c1..84d39a3a8843 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml >>> @@ -781,6 +781,11 @@ properties: >>> - const: rockchip,rk3568-bpi-r2pro >>> - const: rockchip,rk3568 >>> >>> + - description: EmbedFire LubanCat 1 >>> + items: >>> + - const: embedfire,lubancat-1 >>> + - const: rockchip,rk3566 >> >> Here as well. > > This change was addressing the previous comment in V2: > >> This is separate patch. Does not look like properly ordered. Don't add >> stuff at the end of files/lists. > > The previous PATCH v2 merged changes in 3 diffent files: > > 1. arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile > 2. arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-lubancat-1.dts > 3. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml > > What we do in this PATCH v4 was separated the 3 into a separated patch. So how did you solve the comment "Does not look like properly ordered. Don't add stuff at the end of files/lists."? What did you change to solve it? Best regards, Krzysztof