On 14/12/2022 14:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 14/12/2022 14:24, Emekcan Aras wrote: >> From: Emekcan Aras <Emekcan.Aras@xxxxxxx> > > 1. Your From does not match SoB exactly. Avoid it and make it consistent. > > 2. Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (git log --oneline -- ...). > > 3. Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary > people and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an > older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you > base your patches on recent Linux kernel. > > >> >> Add bindings to describe implementation of >> the ARM Corstone500 platform. > > Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission > process: > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586 > >> >> Signed-off-by: Emekcan Aras <emekcan.aras@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/arm/arm,corstone500.yaml | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,corstone500.yaml >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,corstone500.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,corstone500.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..cfe41f7760fd >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,corstone500.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/arm,corstone500.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: ARM Corstone500 >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Emekcan Aras <emekcan.aras@xxxxxxx> >> + - Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@xxxxxxxxxx> >> + >> +description: |+ >> + Corstone-500 is an ideal starting point for feature rich System on Chip >> + (SoC) designs based on the Cortex-A5 core. These designs can be used in >> + Internet of Things (IoT) and embedded products. > > Yet you do not allow to re-use your DTS, so how this re-usage of design > will happen? > OK, so similar as Corstone 1000, but please tell me - any reason why you keep them separate in the bindings? Next time new file for Corstone 1001, 1002, 2000, 2221 etc.? Best regards, Krzysztof