Hi Geert,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 5:15 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:55 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Pass direction and operation to ALT_CMO_OP() macro.
> >
> > Vendors might want to perform different operations based on the direction
> > and callbacks (arch_sync_dma_for_device/arch_sync_dma_for_cpu/
> > arch_dma_prep_coherent) so to handle such cases pass the direction and
> > operation to ALT_CMO_OP() macro. This is in preparation for adding errata
> > for the Andes CPU core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h
> > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( \
> > #define THEAD_flush_A0 ".long 0x0275000b"
> > #define THEAD_SYNC_S ".long 0x0190000b"
> >
> > -#define ALT_CMO_OP(_op, _start, _size, _cachesize) \
> > +#define ALT_CMO_OP(_op, _start, _size, _cachesize, _dir, _ops) \
>
> Since commit a49ab905a1fc8630 ("RISC-V: Implement arch specific PMEM
> APIs") in riscv/for-next, there are two new users of this macro,
> which need to be updated to (add two zeroes?).
>
Thanks for pointing that out, I'll rebase on for-next. I think -1
would be a better option than zeros.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
