On 08/12/2022 11:12, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2022-12-04 17:19:05, Luca Weiss wrote: >> On Freitag, 2. Dezember 2022 10:36:58 CET Marijn Suijten wrote: >> [..] >> >> So the way this patch does it is good or does it need changes? > > Except the typo(s?) pointed out in my first reply, this is good to go. > > If we stick with generic adc-chan node names that should be documented > in the bindings IMO, as it is currently only captured implicitly in the > examples. Krzysztof, what is your thought on this? If I understand correctly, the outcome of other discussion [1] was to use labels and generic node names. In such case the patch was correct (except other comments). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221112162719.0ac87998@jic23-huawei/ Best regards, Krzysztof
