On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:12:03PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > Add the device tree bindings for the MaxLinear GPY2xx PHYs. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > --- > > Is the filename ok? I was unsure because that flag is only for the GPY215 > for now. But it might also apply to others. Also there is no compatible > string, so.. > > .../bindings/net/maxlinear,gpy2xx.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/maxlinear,gpy2xx.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/maxlinear,gpy2xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/maxlinear,gpy2xx.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d71fa9de2b64 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/maxlinear,gpy2xx.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/maxlinear,gpy2xx.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: MaxLinear GPY2xx PHY > + > +maintainers: > + - Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> > + - Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml# > + > +properties: > + maxlinear,use-broken-interrupts: > + description: | > + Interrupts are broken on some GPY2xx PHYs in that they keep the > + interrupt line asserted even after the interrupt status register is > + cleared. Thus it is blocking the interrupt line which is usually bad > + for shared lines. By default interrupts are disabled for this PHY and > + polling mode is used. If one can live with the consequences, this > + property can be used to enable interrupt handling. > + > + Affected PHYs (as far as known) are GPY215B and GPY215C. > + type: boolean > + > +dependencies: > + maxlinear,use-broken-interrupts: [ interrupts ] > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + ethernet { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + ethernet-phy@0 { > + reg = <0>; > + interrupts-extended = <&intc 0>; > + maxlinear,use-broken-interrupts; > + }; > + }; I'm wondering if we want this in the example. We probably don't want people to use this property by accident, i.e. copy/paste without reading the rest of the document. This will becomes a bigger problem if more properties are added, RGMII delays etc. So maybe just skip the example? Andrew
