Thank you for quick review. I will wait for other reviewers to review
patch 2 & 3.
I will address all review comments and sendnew revision.
On 11/24/2022 2:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 24/11/2022 09:35, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
Tegra234 supports PCIe lane margining. P2U HW acts as a relay to exchange
typo: merging?
It is not typo, it is PCIe feature lane margining.
https://pcisig.com/pushing-limits-understanding-lane-margining-pcie%C2%AE
margin control data and margin status between PCIe controller and UPHY.
Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.
I verified these patches on 6.0.0-rc6 kernel and executed get_maintainers.pl
script on it. Did I miss anyone here?
Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/phy/phy-tegra194-p2u.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-tegra194-p2u.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-tegra194-p2u.yaml
index 4dc5205d893b..0ba3f6a0b474 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-tegra194-p2u.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-tegra194-p2u.yaml
@@ -40,6 +40,51 @@ properties:
'#phy-cells':
const: 0
+ interrupts:
+ items:
+ description: P2U interrupt for Gen4 lane margining functionality.
typo: merging?
It is not typo, it is PCIe feature lane margining.
https://pcisig.com/pushing-limits-understanding-lane-margining-pcie%C2%AE
+
+ interrupt-names:
+ items:
+ - const: intr
Drop entire property, not really useful.
In driver, I am using platform_get_irq_byname(), I will change it to
platform_get_irq()
and drop this property.
+
+ nvidia,bpmp:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+ description: Must contain a pair of phandles to BPMP controller node followed by P2U ID.
+ items:
+ - items:
+ - description: phandle to BPMP controller node
+ - description: P2U instance ID
+ maximum: 24
+
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - nvidia,tegra194-p2u
+ then:
+ required:
+ - reg
+ - reg-names
+ - '#phy-cells'
That's not how it should be done. You have only two variants here, so
add a "required:" block with above and only one if:then: clause for
interrupts and nvidia,bpmp.
Requiring reg/reg-names/phy-cells should be in separate patch with its
own reasoning.
Ok, I will create two separate patches and add if:then clause only for
tegra234.
As per understanding final change will look like below, right?
required:
- reg
- reg-names
- '#phy-cells'
allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- nvidia,tegra234-p2u
then:
required:
- interrupts
- nvidia,bpmp
Best regards,
Krzysztof
