On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 10:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 27/11/2022 22:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 23:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27/11/2022 22:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 20:19, Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Document the OnePlus One ("bacon") which is a smartphone based on the
> >>>> Snapdragon 801 SoC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also allow msm8974 devices to use qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id.
> >>>
> >>> The patch itself is good. However it raised a broader question for me.
> >>> Up to now all msm8974pro devices use qcom,msm8974 as a top-level
> >>> compatibility string. Should it be changed to use pro-specific one
> >>> (e.g. qcom,msm8974pro)?
> >>
> >> Yes, makes sense.
> >
> > Would you make the patch?
>
> I do not plan to. I don't know which ones are Pro which aren't.
Ack, I'll do it then.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
