The children of the switch node don't have a unit address, and therefore
should not need the #address-cells or #size-cells entries. Fix the example
schemas accordingly.
Suggested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3
* New patch
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
index 978162df51f7..6fc9bc985726 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/qca8k.yaml
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ examples:
switch@10 {
compatible = "qca,qca8337";
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
reset-gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
reg = <0x10>;
@@ -209,8 +207,6 @@ examples:
switch@10 {
compatible = "qca,qca8337";
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
reset-gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
reg = <0x10>;
--
2.25.1
